Court: | ohsd |
Docket #: | 1:92-cv-00633 |
Case Name: | MIM Industries Inc v. Mitsubishi Electron, et al |
PACER case #: | 12654 |
Date filed: | 1992-08-03 |
Date terminated: | 1993-07-20 |
Assigned to: | Judge S Arthur Spiegel |
Case Cause: | 35:271 Patent Infringement |
Nature of Suit: | 830 Patent |
Jury Demand: | Plaintiff |
Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
Represented Party | Attorney & Contact Info |
MIM Industries Inc Plaintiff Corporation of State of Ohio and has place of business at Miamisburg OH |
John William Donahue |
Mitsubishi Electronics America Inc Defendant Corporation of State of Delaware doing business at Mason, OH |
Ronald Joseph Snyder |
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation Defendant |
Ronald Joseph Snyder |
Brother International Corporation Defendant is a corporation of the State of Delaware, doing business in this judicial district TERMINATED: 11/05/1992 |
|
Mitsubishi Electronics America Inc Counter Claimant |
Ronald Joseph Snyder |
MIM Industries Inc Counter Defendant |
John William Donahue |
Date Filed | Document # | Attachment # | Short Description | Long Description | Upload date | SHA1 hash |
1992-08-03 | 1 | 0 | COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT with Jury Demand Endorsed thereon. (Summonses issued) ( no. pgs: 6 + exhibits.) (wy) (Entered: 08/04/1992) | |||
1992-08-03 | 2 | 0 | AFFIDAVIT of Machiko Yamada Yeung that Japanese translation of the Summons regarding complaint [1-1] is a true & accurate translation. ( no pgs: 1 +) (wy) (Entered: 08/04/1992) | |||
1992-08-20 | 3 | 0 | Stipulation and ORDER by Judge S. A. Spiegel : extending time to answer to Sep 28, 1992 (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 1) (wy) (Entered: 08/20/1992) | |||
1992-09-03 | 4 | 0 | Stipulation and ORDER by Judge S. A. Spiegel : extending time to answer to 9/28/92 (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 2) (wy) (Entered: 09/03/1992) | |||
1992-09-04 | 5 | 0 | MOTION by defendant Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc for admission of attorneys: Donald R. Harris, Ronald Lee Wanke, and Mark S. Suri, pro hac vice ( no pgs: 6) (wy) (Entered: 09/04/1992) | |||
1992-09-08 | 6 | 0 | ORDER by Judge S. A. Spiegel granting motion for admission of attorneys: Donald R. Harris, Ronald Lee Wanke, and Mark S. Suri, pro hac vice [5-1] (cc: all counsel) ( pgs: 1) (wy) (Entered: 09/08/1992) | |||
1992-09-18 | 7 | 0 | Stipulation l : extending time to answer until 10/12/92 ( no pgs: 1) (wy) (Entered: 09/21/1992) | |||
1992-09-25 | 8 | 0 | ANSWER to complaint [1-1] and COUNTERCLAIM by defendant Mitsubishi Electron against plaintiff MIM Industries Inc ( no pgs: 18) (wy) (Entered: 09/25/1992) | |||
1992-10-13 | 9 | 0 | ANSWER by defendant Mitsubishi Electric Corp ( no pgs: 6) (wy) (Entered: 10/13/1992) | |||
1992-10-14 | 10 | 0 | REPLY by plaintiff re counterclaim [8-2] ( no pgs: 11) (wy) (Entered: 10/14/1992) | |||
1992-10-15 | 11 | 0 | AMENDED COMPLAINT by plaintiff MIM Industries Inc adding Brother Interntional Corp ( no pgs: 6) (wy) (Entered: 10/16/1992) | |||
1992-11-02 | 12 | 0 | ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE by defendant Brother Intl Corp on 10/22/92 ( no pgs: 1) (wy) (Entered: 11/03/1992) | |||
1992-11-05 | 13 | 0 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal as to counterclaim deft, Brother Intl Corporation, without prejudice, by MIM Industries Inc. ( no pgs.: 3) (wy) (Entered: 11/05/1992) | |||
1992-11-09 | 14 | 0 | REQUEST by plaintiff for service abroad of judicial or extrajudicial documents on The Minister of Foreign Affairs at Tokyo Japan. ( no pgs: 1 + 2 certificates (in Japanese) (wy) (Entered: 11/10/1992) | |||
1992-11-12 | 15 | 0 | MOTION by defendant Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc; and, defendant Mitsubishi Electric Corp for protective order in form attached as Exhibit A ( no pgs: 27) (wy) (Entered: 11/16/1992) | |||
1992-12-02 | 16 | 0 | RESPONSE by plaintiff MIM Industries Inc to motion for protective order in form attached as Exhibit A [15-1] ( no pgs: 23) (wy) (Entered: 12/02/1992) | |||
1992-12-09 | 17 | 0 | NOTICE of hearing setting motion for protective order [15-1] at 10:00 1/8/93 (cc: all counsel) (wy) (Entered: 12/09/1992) | |||
1992-12-15 | 18 | 0 | REPLY by defendant in support of motion for protective order [15-1] ( no pgs: 12) (wy) (Entered: 12/15/1992) | |||
1992-12-18 | 19 | 0 | NOTICE OF FILING by defendant of the DECLARATION OF KENJI KOBAYASHI. ( no pgs: 6) (wy) (Entered: 12/18/1992) | |||
1993-01-08 | 20 | 0 | CIVIL MINUTES: Proceeding before Mag. Judge Robert A. Steinberg granting motion for protective order [15-1] Ct. Rptr: Susan Creighton ( no pgs: 1) (wy) (Entered: 01/08/1993) | |||
1993-01-11 | 21 | 0 | ORDER by Mag. Judge Robert A. Steinberg granting motion for protective order [15-1] (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 2) (wy) (Entered: 01/11/1993) | |||
1993-01-14 | 22 | 0 | NOTICE setting this action for Preliminary PTC 8:30 1/26/93 no pgs: 1 (cc: all counsel) (wy) (Entered: 01/15/1993) | |||
1993-02-09 | 23 | 0 | PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER by Judge S. A. Spiegel ; Preliminary pretrial conf was held on 8:30 1/26/93 ; discovery cutoff ddl set for 9/1/93 ;mtn filing ddl set for 10/1/93 ; final pretrial conf set for 9:00 2/3/94; expect 10-day jury trial set for 4/4/94. Settlement conference set for 4:00 7/16/93 ( no pgs: 2) (cc: all counsel) (wy) (Entered: 02/09/1993) | |||
1993-06-24 | 24 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiff MIM Industries Inc for order to compel discovery ( no pgs: 10) (wy) (Entered: 06/24/1993) | |||
1993-06-24 | 25 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiff for protective order ( no pgs: 7) (wy) (Entered: 06/24/1993) | |||
1993-07-09 | 26 | 0 | NOTICE of hearing ; Settlement conference in Room 838 set for 4:00 7/16/93 (cc: all counsel) (wy) (Entered: 07/12/1993) | |||
1993-07-20 | 27 | 0 | ORDER by Judge S. A. Spiegel dismissing case with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, within 60 days, reopen if settlement is not consummated (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 1) (wy) (Entered: 07/27/1993) | |||
1993-09-15 | 28 | 0 | STIPULATION to extend 60-day period in which parties have to reopen if settlement is not consummated. ( no pgs: 2) (wy) (Entered: 09/16/1993) | |||
1993-09-16 | 29 | 0 | ORDER by Judge S. A. Spiegel dismissing case with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown, reopen on or before 10/4/93 if settlement is not consummated (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 1) (wy) (Entered: 09/16/1993) |